From Oxford University, then-Rhodes Scholar Rachel Myrick received an completely new point of view on U.S. foreign policy.
“It was there wherever I invested a good deal of time examining about these huge classical debates about worldwide safety and considered a whole lot about America’s job in the earth from an intercontinental point of view,” suggests Myrick, who this slide grew to become an assistant analysis professor in Duke’s political science division.
People extensive-standing theories and ideas were upended in 2016 with the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States, she suggests.
“Trump got elected and contemplating about how partisanship influences intercontinental relations turned more essential than ever,” she says. “It solidified political science as an place exploding with investigation alternatives.”
Ahead of her time at Oxford, as an undergraduate Morehead-Cain Scholar at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Myrick believed she might pursue a vocation in journalism or nonprofit get the job done associated to international growth. She experienced spent some time in Rwanda and Cambodia, learning civil conflict and political violence.
Then she took political sciences courses at UNC. That gave her clarity and a profession path: Educational study in intercontinental relations.
Right now Myrick is also a Ph.D. applicant in the Division of Political Science at Stanford College, and a senior scholar at the Carnegie Intercontinental Plan Scholar Consortium and Community.
In fall 2021, she will begin as a tenure-track assistant professor at Duke, as element of the Stability, Peace, and Conflict group.
In the coming calendar year, she’ll concentration on her dissertation and producing. Some of her investigation all through graduate faculty has been revealed in main political science journals.
Specially, Myrick researches how partisan polarization affects overseas policymaking in democratic states, with an emphasis on U.S. nationwide stability plan. Myrick is also fascinated in the interplay involving domestic and intercontinental politics in issues of stability and conflict.
She’s writing a reserve about how partisanship is impacting overseas plan between democracies and how that divide “is earning us rethink the way democratic states have pros in overseas coverage.”
“I’m fascinated in how severe polarization complicates that kind of wisdom,” Myrick says.
At Duke, she’s in particular energized about alternatives with the Method in American Grand Approach, which delivers famous speakers to campus. Previous speakers include previous ambassador John Bolton and previous White Household main of workers Gen. John Kelly.
“It’s incredibly awesome for me since the college dovetails my American overseas plan passions, type of on the practitioner aspect of matters, with this terrific, really reputable political science department,” Myrick claims.
“I appreciate Durham so I am super energized to be below,” she states. Myrick just lately bought a house in Durham –- a major upgrade from her modest condominium in San Francisco, she notes.
With so a great deal uncertainty pinned to results of the November presidential election, Myrick is specially interested in how overseas plan could transform depending on who wins.
“I am intrigued in partisan debates about global cooperation and conflict,” she suggests, introducing that undoing a previous administration’s international policy for partisan motives can prove “dangerous.”
She notes the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal the Obama administration helped negotiate.
“Successful international policy-generating is predicated about the idea that you can make and keep these official commitments around time,” she says. “If a chief has partisan incentives to undo the guidelines of their predecessor, it has damaging impacts for The us and our capacity to make and retain commitments credibly.”
Myrick is also functioning on a paper on exterior security threats and domestic polarization, a matter she talked about when interviewing for her posture at Duke.
“Intuition and the frequent conception is that main threats from overseas powers will lessen polarization — men and women bind jointly towards a prevalent enemy,” she suggests.
But traditionally, there is not evidence that crises usually heal a partisan divide.
Americans’ hostile and divided response the present-day community well being disaster is regular with her results, she notes.
“So coronavirus took place, and you would believe here’s a issue that ought to significantly bind us together. … I assume there are a whole lot of parallels in the existing atmosphere – we see this big danger arise that, in theory, need to unite but us, but as an alternative it has revealed how polarized we are.”