A lawsuit submitted last week towards the College of Southern California by a legislation faculty graduate, Courtney Whittier, alleges the school’s “replete with sexual misconduct,” and that there’s a “policy of indifference” to misconduct claims. The criticism alleges violations of the Title IX of the Instruction Amendments of 1972.
According to the criticism, Whittier alleges she attended a school-sanctioned party at a bar in December of 2017, immediately after which she was raped by a fellow USC student. As described by the ABA Journal, right after Whittier described the rape to the dean, she alleges the faculty unsuccessful to effectively cope with the declare:
Whittier alleges that the school’s Title IX coordinator pressured her not to initiate a Title IX investigation. When the faculty did carry out an investigation, it violated its possess insurance policies by allowing the alleged perpetrator to critique Whittier’s evidence before publishing his personal proof, Whittier statements. The alleged perpetrator was also authorized to post added proof that was never ever disclosed to Whittier, the go well with claims.
“Most egregiously,” the suit says, “USC predetermined the final result of plaintiff’s criticism in favor of perpetrator just before finishing its investigation.” The go well with cites an alleged assertion by the Title IX coordinator that she would find for Whittier “over [her] dead system.”
In accordance to the grievance, Whittier’s alleged attacker was represented in the Title IX proceedings by a attorney who had earlier sued the faculty on behalf other college students accused of sexual misconduct. Whittier states this led the university to discover in favor of her alleged rapist.
In the Title IX investigation, Whittier’s situation was taken care of by an “Investigator Doe.” Doe submitted a lawsuit against USC in July 2020 also alleging violations of Title IX. Whittier says this is when she became aware of the scope of the difficulty at USC:
Investigator Doe explained in the accommodate they experienced no training in Title IX investigations, which was a violation of a prior consent decree among USC and the U.S. Office of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, in accordance to Whittier. The settlement was achieved just after the business concluded that the school violated Title IX in the way that it responded to sexual misconduct reviews, Whittier claimed.
Investigator Doe alleged that they have been eradicated from Whittier’s investigation just after opposing a final decision to enable the alleged perpetrator to evaluation proof right before he submitted evidence, a violation of USC coverage, Whittier alleged.
USC stated of the complaint, “We are examining the lawsuit in element.”
Examine the comprehensive complaint beneath.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Higher than the Regulation, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so be sure to hook up with her. Feel totally free to e mail her with any ideas, concerns, or feedback and abide by her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).